Join Our Campaign

Municipal Solid Waste
On the Motion to Table
Senate Roll Call No. 84
107th Congress, 2nd Session

Agreed to: 50-46 (see complete tally)
Garbage incineration is one of our nationís costliest and most dangerous means of generating energy, releasing large quantities of such toxic chemicals as lead and dioxin into the atmosphere. In addition, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, garbage incinerators in 2000 emitted 2.2 tons of mercuryónearly 20 percent of the nationís mercury emissionsópolluting groundwater and surface water, contaminating fish populations, and significantly raising the risk of neurological damage and birth defects in humans. These toxic impacts have prompted conservationists to oppose garbage incineration.

The Senate energy bill (S. 517) contained a provision requiring the largest investor-owned electric utilities to generate at least 10 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Recognizing this provisionís potential economic boon, advocates for the garbage incineration industry argued that incinerators should be defined as a renewable energy source. Conservationists countered that such a definition would impede our nationís progress toward clean renewable energy sources like wind and solar power.

During Senate debate over the energy bill (S. 517), Senator Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL) introduced an amendment to make clear that garbage incineration is not a renewable energy source. In response, Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) introduced an amendment that would have specifically included incineration as a renewable energy source. Senator Graham later withdrew his amendment, but on April 24, 2002, Senator Bingaman moved to table the Fitzgerald amendment. The Senate approved the motion by a 50-46 vote (Senate roll call vote 84). The pro-environment vote was NO. The vote left the Senate energy bill with no definition of renewable energy sources. At press time the House and Senate conference on the energy package had not produced a final bill.

Vote Map: Senate Roll Call No. 84
Votes For : 50
Votes Against : 46
Not Voting : 4


powered by CQ Roll Call ©2016

Powered by Convio
nonprofit software